De Novo Archive
De Novo is the newest addition to the Minnesota Law Review family. The blog serves as a forum through which the staff, editors, and alumni of the Minnesota Law Review can contribute to legal thought and academic debate.
SCOTUS TAKES ON WOTUS: PREVIEWING SACKETT V. EPA AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR THE CLEAN WATER ACT
By: Sean Downey, Volume 106 Staff Member With its grant of certiorari in Sackett v. EPA, the Supreme Court will take its fourth try at resolving a question that has vexed courts, agencies, lawyers, and landowners: what are “Waters of the United States (WOTUS)?”[1] The Clean Water Act (CWA) prohibits the discharge of pollutants into…
Continue ReadingA $9 BILLION SURPLUS, YET “KIDS CAN’T READ”: MINNESOTA TEACHER STRIKES MAY VIOLATE STUDENTS’ RIGHTS UNDER THE STATE CONSTITUTION AND THE LEGISLATURE HAS A DUTY TO FIX IT
By: Joshua Gutzmann, Volume 106 Staff Member After almost a full week of no school for over 31,000 students,[1] because teachers are on strike in Minneapolis,[2] the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers President declared that they were “ready to go for as long as it takes.”[3] The strikes—authorized by a vote of over 97% in favor[4]—are…
Continue ReadingREMEDYING DECADES OF DISPARITIES IN DRUG SENTENCING: HOW CONCEPCION v. UNITED STATES OPENS THE DOOR FOR BROADER RELIEF IN FIRST STEP ACT RESENTENCING PROCEEDINGS
By: Rhianna Torgerud, Volume 106 Staff Member From 1986 to 2010, one gram of crack cocaine was treated as equivalent to 100 grams of powder cocaine when setting federal statutory minimum and maximum sentences.[1] This 100-to-1 sentencing disparity was widely criticized as discriminatory against African Americans, and other minorities, who are more likely to be…
Continue ReadingTHE UNITED STATES WANTED TO HAVE ITS CAKE, EAT IT, AND AVOID ITS CLEANUP COSTS, TOO
By: Olivia Carroll, Volume 106 Staff Member In 2017, the Territory of Guam brought suit against the United States under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), seeking to recover costs spent on the cleanup of a contaminated site that had been previously used for hazardous waste disposal by the U.S.…
Continue ReadingWAR POWERS UNDER ATTACK
By: Jesse Noltimier, Volume 106 Staff Member On March 29, 2022, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety.[1] The Court will decide whether a veteran can sue the state of Texas, his former employer, for discrimination. Beyond this employment discrimination claim, Torres raises important questions concerning Congress’…
Continue ReadingTHE SUPREME COURT DILUTES MINORITY VOTER RIGHTS: THE FATE OF THE VOTER RIGHTS ACT FOLLOWING MERRILL V. MILLIGAN
By: Justin Oakland, Volume 106 Staff Member Following the 2020 census, a Republican-majority Alabama state legislature voted to redraw congressional districts to functionally dilute the voting power of Black residents.[1] Despite Black voters making up 26.8 percent of Alabama’s population, the redrawn districts only grant Black voters one district of significant representation with the remaining…
Continue ReadingRUSSIAN WARFARE: NEW JERSEY COURT HOLDS RUSSIAN-SPONSORED CYBERATTACK NOTPETYA IS NOT PART OF WAR EXCLUSION FOR ALL-RISK INSURANCE POLICY, AND ILLINOIS MIGHT SOON FOLLOW
By: Caleb Johnson, Volume 106 Staff Member On December 6th, 2021, a New Jersey Superior Court announced in Merck & Co., Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Company that insurance companies could not use a hostilities/war exclusion to deny coverage to biopharmaceutical company Merck’s claim after falling victim to the NotPetya cyberattack.[1] The court focused its…
Continue ReadingREMEDYING DISCRIMINATION IN AGRICULTURAL LENDING: ANALYZING THE LEGAL CHALLENGES FACING THE EMERGENCY RELIEF FOR FARMERS OF COLOR ACT
By: Jackie Cuellar, Volume 106 Staff Member To alleviate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the United States’ economy, Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA).[1] Section 1005 of the ARPA, also referred to as the Emergency Relief for Farmers of Color Act, is a historic provision that allocates $4 billion…
Continue ReadingDON’T FALL ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL: DELAWARE BOARDS SHOULD BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR ESG OVERSIGHT LIABILITY
By: Nick Penn, Volume 106 Staff Member In 2019, the Supreme Court of Delaware put the boardrooms of Delaware corporations on notice with its denial of Blue Bell Creameries’ motion to dismiss a shareholder derivative suit for breach of the board’s duty of oversight.[1] The duty of oversight, a subsidiary of the duty of loyalty,…
Continue ReadingSOVEREIGN CITIZENS: SITTING ON THE DOCKET ALL DAY, WASTING TIME
By: Calvin Lee, Volume 106 Staff Member Sovereign Citizens: a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. The once-isolated political sect has ballooned to over 300,000 followers, and the rapid proliferation of their pseudo-legal ideologies is severely compromising court efficiency.[1] Sovereign Citizens’ abject refusal to stipulate to even the most basic tenets of the…
Continue Reading