Skip to content
Volume 108 - Issue 6

Note: Going Back in Time: The Search for Retroactive Rulemaking Power in Statutory Deadlines

By Chris Schmitter. Full text here. Congress regularly enacts complex laws that require administrative agencies to promulgate rules by specific deadlines. Yet, as agencies do the work of creating rules and, from time to time, miss statutory deadlines, a question remains as to whether an agency can promulgate a rule that is retroactive to the statutory…

Continue Reading

Note: Up or Out: Why “Sufficiently Reliable” Statistical Risk Assessment Is Appropriate at Sentencing and Inappropriate at Parole

By Pari McGarraugh. Full text here. Sentencing judges and parole release authorities are increasingly using statistical risk assessments to guide their decision-making. Risk assessment instruments rely on statistical research and modeling to predict an individual’s chance of recidivating based on information about the individual like age and number of prior arrests. These instruments are subject to…

Continue Reading

Note: First Amendment and the Right to Lie: Regulating Knowingly False Campaign Speech After United States v. Alvarez

By Staci Lieffring. Full text here. With the people relying more and more on political advertising to inform them about candidates and elections, it is imperative to try to stop or limit false speech about candidates and the election procedures. False speech undermines the integrity of elections. This has led some states to enact laws banning…

Continue Reading

Note: Stifled Justice: The Unauthorized Practice of Law and Internet Legal Resources

By Mathew Rotenberg. Full text here. Advances in computer technology are effectively commoditizing the law and revolutionizing the ways in which individuals seek and receive legal services. Internet Legal Providers (ILPs) present tremendous potential for increased access to legal services, which is vital to an increasing number of unrepresented litigants, as well as to combat shrinking…

Continue Reading

Note: Jurisprudential Innovation or Accountability Avoidance? The International Criminal Court and Proposed Expansion of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights

By Kristen Rau. Full text here. From Nuremburg to The Hague, international criminal justice has evolved dynamically and at times unpredictably. Among recent developments is a proposal to expand the subject matter jurisdiction of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights (ACJHR) to include a mandate to prosecute individuals for serious international crimes. Expansion of…

Continue Reading

Note: Warrantless Search Cases Are Really All the Same

By Will Stancil. Full text here. Fourth Amendment jurisprudence confounds. Even with thousands of cases and hundreds of repeated fact patterns to rely on, courts are not able to come up with consistent rules. In order to address the problem, this Note proposes a new way of thinking about warrantless searches. It ignores the debate over…

Continue Reading

Note: It Can Do More Than Protect Your Credit Score: Regulating Social Media

By Nathan J. Ebnet. Full text here. A growing number of employers are factoring job candidates’ social media profiles into their hiring decisions. Employers value social media pre-employment screening because it provides access to previously unobtainable applicant information. However, job candidates are wary of social media pre-employment screening due to concerns over the trustworthiness and authenticity…

Continue Reading

Note: Judicial Review of SEC Rules: Managing the Costs of Cost-Benefit Analysis

By Rachel A. Benedict. Full text here. In the past seven years, the D.C. Circuit has vacated three Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules for failing to conduct an adequate cost-benefit analysis. This string of cases culminated on July 11, 2011 when the D.C. Circuit overturned the SEC’s new proxy access rule. Strict judicial scrutiny of…

Continue Reading

Note: Loaded Questions: A Suggested Constitutional Framework for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

By Reid Golden. Full text here. Recent developments in the interpretation of the Second Amendment left unanswered questions regarding the scope of the constitutional guarantee of armed self-defense. Most importantly, neither District of Columbia v. Heller nor McDonald v. City of Chicago set a firm standard for determining the constitutionality of gun-control laws. This determination is…

Continue Reading