Note: Insufficient Government Protection: The Inescapable Element in Domestic Violence Asylum Cases
By Elsa M. Bullard. Full text here. Domestic violence asylum applicants have spent years struggling to demonstrate they are a particular social group within the meaning of refugee statutes and thus worthy of asylum in the United States. Recent statements by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and a favorable outcome for the applicant in In…
Continue ReadingNote: The Problem with Waste: Delaware's Lenient Treatment of Waste Claims at the Demand Stage of Derivative Litigation
By Jamie L. Kastler. Full text here. This Note addresses the Delaware courts’ treatment of waste claims at the demand stage of derivative litigation. Recent Delaware opinions indicate that waste is part of the fiduciary duty of good faith. This means that directors are not protected from claims of waste by section 102(b)(7) exculpation clauses…
Continue ReadingNote: Diversity Jurisdiction and Injunctive Relief: Using "Moving-Party Approach" to Value the Amount in Controversy
By Christopher A. Pinahs. Full text here. A necessary requirement for federal diversity jurisdiction is that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Injunctions, however, are not a sum certain, and courts often struggle to value this intangible form of relief for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. Further compounding this problem is the fact that injunctions often differentially…
Continue ReadingNote: Challenging Peremptories: Suggested Reforms to the Jury Selection Process Using Minnesota as a Case Study
By Maisa Jean Frank. Full text here. Jury selection proceeds differently in each state. Though not constitutionally mandated, each jurisdiction allows attorneys to exercise peremptory challenges as part of the process. During the past sixty years, members of the legal profession have consistently called into question the validity of this practice. Supreme Court jurisprudence gives selected…
Continue ReadingNote: The Due Process Rights of Parents to Cross-Examine Guardians Ad Litem in Custody Disputes: The Reality and the Ideal
By Emily Gleiss. Full text here. Currently, state statutes that govern guardian ad litem appointments for children in custody disputes fail to protect the due process rights of parents. Focused solely on the best interests of children, these laws provide few safeguards against the infringement of parents’ rights to the care, custody, and control of their…
Continue ReadingNote: Federal Preemption and the Rating Agencies: Eliminating State Law Liability to Promote Quality Ratings
By Timothy M. Sullivan. Full text here. The credit rating agencies remain under intense scrutiny amidst the current financial crisis. Congress is currently considering multiple proposals to alter the federal regime for regulating rating agencies. Meanwhile, large-scale investors such as the California Public Employees Retirement Services (CalPERS) have commenced major litigation to recover losses allegedly suffered…
Continue ReadingNote: Expanding the Role of Trade Preference Programs
By Monica Patel. Full text here. Trade preference programs lower trade barriers for developing countries and open opportunities in consumer-driven markets which, in turn, increases their trade and economic growth. One example of a trade preference program in the United States is the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program that provides duty-free treatment for about 4800…
Continue ReadingNote: Turning Winners into Losers: Ponzi Scheme Avoidance Law and the Inequity of Clawbacks
By Karen E. Nelson. Full text here. The sentencing of Bernard Madoff in 2008 closed a chapter in the saga of one of the most extensive and destructive Ponzi schemes in American history. But the fallout from the fraud is just beginning. While every investor in a Ponzi scheme suffers financially once the fraud is exposed,…
Continue ReadingNote: Hold Fast the Keys to the Kingdom: Federal Administrative Agencies and the Need for Brady Disclosure
By Justin Goetz. Full text here. Due process protections for defendants vary greatly between the numerous federal agencies vested with civil enforcement powers. Many of these agencies fail to provide defendants with basic safeguards, including the protections available in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. As federal administrative agencies continue to increase both the scope of…
Continue ReadingNote: Meeting Boumediene′s Challenge: The Emergence of an Effective Habeas Jurisprudence and Obsolescence of New Detention Legislation
By Nathaniel H. Nesbitt. Full text here. The Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. Bush gave suspected terrorists at Guantánamo Bay access to a system in which federal judges in Washington, D.C. adjudicate the legality of their detention. While many, perhaps most, legal commentators praise Boumediene as a victory for individual rights, critics argue that the…
Continue Reading