Comment: Giving Lawrence Its Due: How the Eleventh Circuit Underestimated the Due Process Implications of Lawrence v. Texas in Lofton v. Secretary of the Department of Children & Family Services
By Megan Backer. Full text here. John Doe was born an orphan. His life changed immediately when Steven Lofton adopted him. But John has no assurance that the State will allow him to remain with his family. Although John calls his foster father “Dad,” that will never be Steven Lofton’s legal title. John’s foster father is…
Continue ReadingThe Marshall Court and the Originalist's Dilemma
By Peter J. Smith. Full text here. In response to Anti-Federalist complaints that the Constitution was dangerous because it was ambiguous, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton argued that judges would construe the Constitution in the same manner that they construed statutes, and in the process would fix the meaning of ambiguous constitutional provisions. In other words,…
Continue ReadingThe "Duty" To Be a Rational Shareholder
By David A. Hoffman. Full text here. How and when do courts determine that corporate disclosures are actionable under the federal securities laws? The applicable standard is materiality: would a (mythical) reasonable investor have considered a given disclosure important. Through empirical and statistical testing of approximately 500 cases analyzing the materiality standard, Professor Hoffman concludes…
Continue ReadingConcordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice
By Paul H. Robinson & Robert Kurzban. Full text here. The common wisdom among criminal law theorists and policy makers is that the notion of desert is vague and subject to wide disagreement. Yet the empirical evidence in available studies, including new studies reported here, paints a dramatically different picture. While moral philosophers may disagree on…
Continue ReadingNote: Compulsory Process and the War on Terror: A Proposed Framework
By Megan A. Healy. Full text here. The War on Terror has presented numerous questions never before examined in our constitutional jurisprudence. The challenges imposed on our legal system since 9/11 compel the judiciary to protect constitutional rights in the most difficult of circumstances. One of these challenges requires our civilian criminal justice system to reconcile…
Continue ReadingNote: Clear Support or Cause for Suspicion? A Critique of Collective Scienter in Securities Litigation
By Kevin M. O’Riordan. Full text here. This Note takes the position that emerging collective scienter theory may bar courts from attributing liability for securities fraud under SEC Rule 10b-5 directly to a corporation. Recent developments under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) seek to strengthen pleading standards in securities litigation by requiring that a…
Continue ReadingClaiming Innocence
By Brandon L. Garrett. Full text here. The advent of DNA testing technology almost two decades ago transformed how courts review claims of innocence. Our system discarded rules of finality that traditionally barred most post-conviction claims of innocence. In recent years, almost every state has enacted post-conviction DNA statutes, which I survey here. Yet our criminal…
Continue ReadingCitizen Journalism and the Reporter's Privilege
By Mary-Rose Papandrea. Full text here. The reporter’s privilege is under attack, and “pajama-clad bloggers” are largely to blame. Courts and commentators have argued that because the rise of bloggers and other “citizen journalists” renders it difficult to define who should be considered a reporter entitled to invoke the privilege, the continued existence of the…
Continue ReadingThe Child Protection Pretense: States' Continued Consignment of Newborn Babies to Unfit Parents
By James G. Dwyer. Full text here. Major federal legislation since the mid-90s has embodied a philosophical shift away from trying to salvage grossly unfit parents and toward ensuring children good families before they incur permanently damaging abuse, neglect, or foster care drift. That legislation has created a widespread perception that the state is now more…
Continue ReadingA Certain Mongrel Court: Congress's Past Power and Present Potential To Reinforce the Supreme Court
By Ross E. Davies. Full text here. The conventional view is that the constitutional mandate that “[t]he judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court” precludes legislation creating some sort of back-up Court. This reading is rooted in the idea that the word “one” in “one supreme Court” must be read…
Continue Reading