Skip to content
Volume 109 - Issue 6

The Need for Mead: Rejecting Tax Exceptionalism in Judicial Deference

By Kristin E. Hickman. Full text here. This Article takes the controversial position that Treasury regulations are entitled to judicial deference under the Chevron doctrine, as clarified by the Supreme Court in the more recent Mead case, whether those regulations promulgated pursuant to specific authority delegated in a substantive provision of the Internal Revenue Code…

Continue Reading

Note: Meet Me at the (West Coast) Hotel: The Lochner Era and the Demise of Roe v. Wade

By Jason A. Adkins. Full text here. Long-standing constitutional precedents can be overturned when the original holdings have become “unworkable.” This principle, first articulated in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey and repeated by now-Chief Justice Roberts in his confirmation hearings, provides a creative means for overturning the most controversial precedent of all: Roe…

Continue Reading

Substantive Due Process as a Source of Constitutional Protection for Nonpolitical Speech

By Gregory P. Magarian. Full text here. Present First Amendment doctrine presumptively protects anything within the descriptive category “expression” from government regulation, subject to balancing against countervailing government interests. As government actions during the present War on Terrorism have made all too clear, that doctrine allows intolerable suppression of political debate and dissent—the expressive activity most…

Continue Reading

Comment: Giving Lawrence Its Due: How the Eleventh Circuit Underestimated the Due Process Implications of Lawrence v. Texas in Lofton v. Secretary of the Department of Children & Family Services

By Megan Backer. Full text here. John Doe was born an orphan.  His life changed immediately when Steven Lofton adopted him.  But John has no assurance that the State will allow him to remain with his family.  Although John calls his foster father “Dad,” that will never be Steven Lofton’s legal title.  John’s foster father is…

Continue Reading

The Marshall Court and the Originalist's Dilemma

By Peter J. Smith. Full text here. In response to Anti-Federalist complaints that the Constitution was dangerous because it was ambiguous, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton argued that judges would construe the Constitution in the same manner that they construed statutes, and in the process would fix the meaning of ambiguous constitutional provisions.  In other words,…

Continue Reading

The "Duty" To Be a Rational Shareholder

By David A. Hoffman. Full text here. How and when do courts determine that corporate disclosures are actionable under the federal securities laws?  The applicable standard is materiality: would a (mythical) reasonable investor have considered a given disclosure important.  Through empirical and statistical testing of approximately 500 cases analyzing the materiality standard, Professor Hoffman concludes…

Continue Reading

Concordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice

By Paul H. Robinson & Robert Kurzban. Full text here. The common wisdom among criminal law theorists and policy makers is that the notion of desert is vague and subject to wide disagreement. Yet the empirical evidence in available studies, including new studies reported here, paints a dramatically different picture. While moral philosophers may disagree on…

Continue Reading

Note: Compulsory Process and the War on Terror: A Proposed Framework

By Megan A. Healy. Full text here. The War on Terror has presented numerous questions never before examined in our constitutional jurisprudence. The challenges imposed on our legal system since 9/11 compel the judiciary to protect constitutional rights in the most difficult of circumstances. One of these challenges requires our civilian criminal justice system to reconcile…

Continue Reading

Note: Clear Support or Cause for Suspicion? A Critique of Collective Scienter in Securities Litigation

By Kevin M. O’Riordan. Full text here. This Note takes the position that emerging collective scienter theory may bar courts from attributing liability for securities fraud under SEC Rule 10b-5 directly to a corporation. Recent developments under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) seek to strengthen pleading standards in securities litigation by requiring that a…

Continue Reading

Claiming Innocence

By Brandon L. Garrett. Full text here. The advent of DNA testing technology almost two decades ago transformed how courts review claims of innocence. Our system discarded rules of finality that traditionally barred most post-conviction claims of innocence. In recent years, almost every state has enacted post-conviction DNA statutes, which I survey here. Yet our criminal…

Continue Reading