Skip to content
Volume 108 - Issue 4

ROBINHOOD’S GOAL IS NOT TO ‘DEMOCRATIZE FINANCE FOR ALL’: DON’T EXPECT GAMESTOP BUYERS’ LAWSUITS TO CHANGE THAT

By: Daniel Raddenbach, Volume 105 Staff Member INTRODUCTION             Robinhood, an investment app designed to make trading easy for small investors,[1] caught national attention in January when hordes of its users banded together to defeat hedge funds[2] who were actively profiting from the decline of the value of GameStop stock.[3] Robinhood’s decision to temporarily halt…

Continue Reading

A GALAXY NOT SO FAR AWAY: THE STATES STRIKE BACK AT BIG TECH OVER GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK’S ALLEGED “JEDI BLUE” PRICE-FIXING SCHEME

By: Avery Bennett, Volume 105 Staff Member  INTRODUCTION Recently, mounting scrutiny and criticism of technology companies’ business practices have led to well publicized calls for investigations and probes into potentially anticompetitive behavior.[1] Amid these calls to curb the industry’s power, state officials have revealed a coordinated effort to contain anticompetitive practices by technology companies,[2] particularly…

Continue Reading

PRESERVING THE E-MARKET OF IDEAS: HOW A NARROW “RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN” EXCEPTION TO SECTION 230 CAN COMBAT DIGITAL HARASSMENT WITHOUT DECIMATING DIGITAL DISCOURSE

By: Jordan Francis, Volume 105 Staff Member Depending on who you ask, we have either handed the levers of public discourse over to the maleficent interests of “Big Tech,” thereby making the Mark Zuckerbergs of the world the arbiters of truth and justice, or we have abandoned all control and given misinformation and hate speech…

Continue Reading

PATENT PLEDGING PROBLEMS: THE OPEN COVID PLEDGE AND LONG-TERM SOLUTIONS TO LICENSING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN GLOBAL EMERGENCIES

By: Marra Clay, Volume 105 Staff Member The American intellectual property system has a single primary goal: to encourage creators to make new things that benefit society in exchange for an exclusive right to use and license the creation for a limited time.[1] The United States government currently lacks authority to mandate most intellectual property…

Continue Reading

CRUEL AND UNUSUAL: THE SUPREME COURT’S FAILURE TO PROTECT DEATH ROW PRISONERS DURING THE GOVERNMENT’S RECENT RUSH OF EXECUTIONS

By: Julia Potach, Volume 105 Staff Member On July 14, 2020, the federal government executed death row prisoner, Daniel Lewis Lee, and carried out its first federal execution in 17 years.[1] One year earlier, former Attorney General William Barr cleared the way for the government to resume executions when he directed the Federal Bureau of…

Continue Reading

RITTMANN V. AMAZON.COM: A WRONG TURN FOR GIG WORKERS LOOKING FOR CLARITY IN THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT

By Zach Krenz, Volume 105 Staffer The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) makes arbitration clauses enforceable. Section 2, which outlines the breadth of the Act, states that arbitration provisions in contracts “involving commerce . . . shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable. . . .”[1] Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act exempts certain categories of…

Continue Reading

THE UBIQUITY OF SOCIAL MEDIA DICTATES THE RESULT: WHY THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD AFFIRM THE THIRD CIRCUIT IN MAHANOY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT V. B.L. AS A MATTER OF NON-DISCRIMINATION

By: Miriam Solomon, Volume 105 Staff Member  In B.L. v. Mahanoy Area School District, the plaintiff, a sophomore in high school, was removed from the school cheerleading team after the team coaches learned of a post B.L. made on Snapchat. After participating on the school’s junior varsity cheerleading team during her freshman year, B.L. tried…

Continue Reading