Skip to content
Volume 108 - Issue 4

FACEBOOK AND THE FRAGMENTED FREE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS

By: Jonathan Baker, Volume 104 Staff Member When the Framers adopted formal protections to free speech with the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791, information exchange and dissemination primarily occurred through “individuals talking one to another, . . . addressing town meetings[,]” or the publication of “handbills, newspapers and periodicals of a few pages, printed…

Continue Reading

PICKING UP THE FLAG ON ILLEGAL PROCEDURE: WHY RULE 41 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED WITH THE TIMES

By: Geoff Koslig, Volume 104 Staff Member The Fourth Amendment’s drafters could have scarcely imagined social media and the internet.[1] For decades, courts have struggled to apply the Amendment to searches of or utilizing new technologies.[2] Recently, courts have struggled with how the Fourth Amendment affects searches of the vast amount of data generated by…

Continue Reading

TITS UP: WHY IT’S TIME FOR THE SUPREME COURT TO RULE ON TOPLESS ORDINANCES

By: Kathryn Campbell, Volume 104 Staff Member The United States loves to exercise control over cis-women’s bodies.[1] Notably, both federal and state governments seemingly fear the exposure of a cis-woman’s exposed “erogenous” areola—although men have them as well.[2] Perhaps the most archaic way in which governments within the United States attempt to regulate women’s bodies…

Continue Reading

WHOSE VOTE MATTERS? WHY PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS SHOULD BE PUBLICLY FUNDED IN ORDER TO BALANCE THE VALUE OF VOTER SPEECH WITH CANDIDATE SPEECH

By Joshua Cottle, Volume 104 Staff Member Over 1.3 billion dollars were spent by candidates in each of the last three presidential campaigns, while political action committees spent more than 4 billion dollars on political advertising.[1] Yet, only twelve percent of the population donated to political campaigns in the 2016 election.[2] As these donations quickly…

Continue Reading

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA: UNSUPPORTED AS A MATTER OF FACT, UNJUSTIFIED AS A MATTER OF LAW

By: Nathan Webster, Volume 104 Staff Member The pay-gap between men and women in the United States is well-established. Hispanic women make 58 cents for every dollar a white man makes.[1] Black women make 67 cents for every dollar earned by a white man.[2] White women make 79 cents.[3] Such disparities also cut across genders,…

Continue Reading

DIRECTIONLESS DIRECTIVES: WHY MINNESOTA SHOULD ESTABLISH AN ADVANCE DIRECTIVE REGISTRY

By: Kaitie Eke, Volume 104 Staff Member In recent decades, advance care planning[1] (“ACP”) has gained momentum in the United States.[2] Through advance directives, a person can communicate their preferences and designate agents to make healthcare decisions on their behalf should the individual become incapacitated.[3] Those who complete advance directives may experience several benefits, including…

Continue Reading