Skip to content

NO LEG TO STAND ON: HOW THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IMPROPERLY RESTRICTED THE APPLICATION OF THE COMPETITOR STANDING DOCTRINE TO PATENT CHALLENGERS WHEN ESTABLISHING ARTICLE III STANDING UPON APPEALING AN INTER PARTES REVIEW

By: Ryan Fitzgerald, Volume 104 Staff Member The Federal Circuit’s recent holding in General Electric Co. v United Technologies Corp.[i] increases the difficulty for competitors to challenge the validity of a patent in court after an adverse inter partes review (IPR) decision.[ii]  An IPR allows any person or institution to challenge the validity of a…

Continue Reading

AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL POLL TAX? PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PROVIDES INSIGHT ON FLORIDA STATUTE SB7066.

By: Seiko Shastri, Vol. 104 Staff Member An estimated 6 million United States citizens do not have the right to vote because of a prior criminal conviction.[1] One-quarter of those disenfranchised individuals––1.5 million Americans––live in the state of Florida.[2] This disenfranchisement has disproportionately affected black residents, preventing nearly 20 percent of black adults of voting…

Continue Reading

A REGULATORY FUMBLE: THE CHANGING REGULATORY SCHEME SURROUNDING GAMBLING AND DAILY FANTASY SPORTS

By: Paul Strey, Volume 104 Staff Member INTRODUCTION On September 26, 2019, the National Football League formally announced that DraftKings would be the official daily fantasy provider for professional football.[1] The partnership allows DraftKings to use the official NFL logo, special highlight reels, and the NFL’s NextGen statistics program.[2] This endorsement represents the first time…

Continue Reading

SEVENTH CIRCUIT’S LEGAL PRUDISHNESS: INCORRECT DECISION IN TRAN CREATES A SPLIT

By: Zach Wright, Volume 104 Staff Member The Seventh Circuit decided Tran v. Minnesota Life Ins. Co. (“Tran”) in April of 2019.[I] Tran stemmed from a beneficiary’s claim for benefits under an ERISA-governed life insurance policy after their spouse died engaging in autoerotic asphyxiation.[ii] The court held that a reasonable person would conclude death by autoerotic asphyxiation…

Continue Reading

CITIES ARE TURNING ON CONVERSION THERAPY BANS

By: Melanie Griffith, Volume 104 Staff Member INTRODUCTION The tides are turning on the trend of conversion therapy bans. Conversion therapy is a controversial practice that purports to “cure” homosexual or transgender individuals by attempting to change their sexual orientation or gender identity.[1] Therapists use methods ranging from aversion therapy and shock therapy to seemingly-benign…

Continue Reading

NO TOLL FOR THE TAXPAYER: FINANCIAL DISABILITY, STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS REFUND TOLLING, AND COURTS’ STRICT APPLICATION OF “AUTHORITY”

By: Casey Epstein, Volume 104 Staff Member INTRODUCTION Imagine you are poor, mentally-ill, and struggle to manage your finances. You granted your adult son durable power of attorney (“DPA”),[1] but are no longer on speaking terms with him. You work a low-wage, menial job and your paychecks are subject to typical tax withholdings. Because of…

Continue Reading

The Law Review Appears on NPR’s Planet Money

Law Review Editor Thomas Hansfield appeared on NPR‘s Planet Money podcast to discuss his Minnesota Law Review article about in-game video game purchases and whether or not they fit the legal definition of gambling.  Listen to the podcast episode here.

Continue Reading

Judicial Attire: An Alteration to “Under the Robes”

By: Erik M. Jensen* In 2009, the GreenBag, which (with justification) bills itself as An Entertaining Journal of Law, published my revealing essay on judicial attire—or, more precisely, on what is hidden by judicial attire[i]—Under the Robes: A Judicial Right to Bare Arms and Legs and . . .?[ii]  Along the way I hypothesized that, because a judicial…

Continue Reading