Skip to content
Article

Citizenship Disparities

By Emily Ryo and Reed Humphrey | November 21, 2022

By Emily Ryo and Reed Humphrey. Full text.  Citizenship is “nothing less than the right to have rights,” wrote Chief Justice Warren in his Perez v. Brownell dissent. Yet no study to date has been able to systematically investigate agency decisions to grant or deny citizenship in an administrative process called naturalization adjudication. This Article…

Read More
Article

Rethinking the Crime of Rioting

By Nick Robinson | November 21, 2022

By Nick Robinson. Full Text. The fear of riots has long loomed large in the public imagination. This fear is at least partly justified. Riots can present unique challenges, both in the harm they can cause and in the government’s ability to control them. However, from the American colonies to the Civil Rights era, there…

Read More
Article

Unsexing Breastfeeding

By Naomi Schoenbaum | November 21, 2022

By Naomi Schoenbaum. Full Text.  For half a century, constitutional sex equality doctrine has been combating harmful sex stereotypes by invalidating laws that treat women as caregivers and men as breadwinners. Yet decades after the constitutional sex equality revolution unsexed parenting roles, one area of parenting has escaped this doctrine’s exacting gaze: breastfeeding. In the…

Read More
Article

Killing the Motivation of the Minority Law Professor

By Goldburn P. Maynard Jr. | November 21, 2022

By Goldburn P. Maynard Jr. Full Text. This Essay hypothesizes that a significant number of minority junior scholars with radical or non-normative ideas forego those projects or mute them to fit their work within the dominant paradigm of legal scholarship. Even those who move forward and publish their radical or non-normative proposals spend significant time…

Read More
Article

Optional Legislation

By Jacob Bronsther and Guha Krishnamurthi | November 21, 2022

By Jacob Bronsther and Guha Krishnamurthi. Full Text.  Not since the nineteenth century has partisanship been this intense. The only thing that Democrats and Republicans can agree upon, it seems, is that “Washington is broken.” Beyond the chimeras of bipartisanship or enduring one-party rule, this Article proposes a new solution to legislative dysfunction in Washington:…

Read More
Note

Unprotected but Not Forgotten: A Call to Action to Help Federal Judiciary Employees Address Workplace Sexual Misconduct

By Theresa M. Green | November 21, 2022

By Theresa M. Green. Full Text.  Federal judiciary employees are not currently protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964—the federal statute that prohibits workplace discrimination, retaliation, and harassment based on, among other things, a person’s sex. In effect, this means federal judiciary employees are not adequately protected from sexual misconduct. Like…

Read More
Note

The Diversity Formula: A Race-Neutral Playbook for Equitable Student Assignment and its Application to Magnet Schools

By Joshua Gutzmann | November 21, 2022

By Joshua Gutzmann. Full Text.  Contrary to the revisionist history told by some, Brown v. Board of Education did not mark a permanent end to school segregation. Indeed, by some measures, many school districts have experienced increases in racial and socioeconomic segregation over the past few decades. And the impact of this segregation manifests itself…

Read More
Note

Gruel and Unusual: Prison Punishment Diets and the Eighth Amendment

By Jackie Cuellar | November 21, 2022

By Jackie Cuellar. Full Text.  For as long as prisons have existed, food has been used as a mechanism of prisoner control. One of the earliest forms of food as punishment was the aptly named “bread-and-water diet,” providing prisoners with just 700 calories per day. The diet was later deemed cruel and unusual in violation…

Read More

Articles, Essays, & Tributes

Unsexing Breastfeeding

By Naomi Schoenbaum. Full Text.  For half a century, constitutional sex equality doctrine has been combating harmful sex stereotypes by invalidating laws that treat women as caregivers and men as breadwinners. Yet decades after the constitutional sex equality revolution unsexed parenting roles, one area of parenting has escaped this doctrine’s exacting gaze: breastfeeding. In the

Killing the Motivation of the Minority Law Professor

By Goldburn P. Maynard Jr. Full Text. This Essay hypothesizes that a significant number of minority junior scholars with radical or non-normative ideas forego those projects or mute them to fit their work within the dominant paradigm of legal scholarship. Even those who move forward and publish their radical or non-normative proposals spend significant time

Optional Legislation

By Jacob Bronsther and Guha Krishnamurthi. Full Text.  Not since the nineteenth century has partisanship been this intense. The only thing that Democrats and Republicans can agree upon, it seems, is that “Washington is broken.” Beyond the chimeras of bipartisanship or enduring one-party rule, this Article proposes a new solution to legislative dysfunction in Washington:

Citizenship Disparities

By Emily Ryo and Reed Humphrey. Full text.  Citizenship is “nothing less than the right to have rights,” wrote Chief Justice Warren in his Perez v. Brownell dissent. Yet no study to date has been able to systematically investigate agency decisions to grant or deny citizenship in an administrative process called naturalization adjudication. This Article

Rethinking the Crime of Rioting

By Nick Robinson. Full Text. The fear of riots has long loomed large in the public imagination. This fear is at least partly justified. Riots can present unique challenges, both in the harm they can cause and in the government’s ability to control them. However, from the American colonies to the Civil Rights era, there

Notes

Gruel and Unusual: Prison Punishment Diets and the Eighth Amendment

By Jackie Cuellar. Full Text.  For as long as prisons have existed, food has been used as a mechanism of prisoner control. One of the earliest forms of food as punishment was the aptly named “bread-and-water diet,” providing prisoners with just 700 calories per day. The diet was later deemed cruel and unusual in violation

The Diversity Formula: A Race-Neutral Playbook for Equitable Student Assignment and its Application to Magnet Schools

By Joshua Gutzmann. Full Text.  Contrary to the revisionist history told by some, Brown v. Board of Education did not mark a permanent end to school segregation. Indeed, by some measures, many school districts have experienced increases in racial and socioeconomic segregation over the past few decades. And the impact of this segregation manifests itself

Unprotected but Not Forgotten: A Call to Action to Help Federal Judiciary Employees Address Workplace Sexual Misconduct

By Theresa M. Green. Full Text.  Federal judiciary employees are not currently protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964—the federal statute that prohibits workplace discrimination, retaliation, and harassment based on, among other things, a person’s sex. In effect, this means federal judiciary employees are not adequately protected from sexual misconduct. Like

Headnotes

Term Limits and Embracing a Political Supreme Court

By Guha Krishnamurthi. Full Text. In the run up to the 2020 Presidential election, then-candidate Joseph R. Biden, Jr. lamented the increasing dysfunction of the United States Supreme Court and campaigned on rectifying the august institution. This was indeed part of Biden’s general message: a return to norms, normalcy, and mutual respect. The problems with

A Century of Business in the Supreme Court, 1920–2020

By Lee Epstein and Mitu Gulati. Full Text.  A decade and a half into its life, we ask: how pro-business is the Roberts Court? Using a simple objective measure—how often does business win in the Court when it is fighting a non-business—we find that the Roberts Court may be the most pro-business Court in a

Handling the Mayo Powder Keg: Emphasizing Preemption in § 101 Biotechnology Inquiries

By Zachary M. Robole. Full Text.  To incite a jury’s emotions, attorneys have stated that the “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard required to invalidate a patent is the same standard of proof required to justify taking a child away from a parent. Although such statements are likely an evidentiary rule violation, the point is illustrative

“What Has Always Been True”: The Washington Supreme Court Decides That Seizure Law Must Account for Racial Disparity in Policing

By Aliza Hochman Bloom. Full Text. In June, the Washington Supreme Court held that courts must consider an individual’s race as part of the totality of circumstances when determining whether that individual has been seized by a police officer. Like the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Washington’s parallel constitutional provision requires that the determination

Antitrust Reformers Should Consider the Consequences of Mandatory Treble Damages: What the Admonition Against Putting New Wine in Old Wineskins Can Teach Us About Antitrust Reform

By Henry J. Hauser, Tiffany L. Lee, and Thomas G. Krattenmaker. Full Text. The debate over antitrust reform is reaching a crescendo. Several proposals have been introduced in Congress and state legislatures to expand the scope of substantive antitrust rules governing marketplace behavior. Missing from the current discussion, however, is careful consideration of whether these

De Novo Blog

SOVEREIGN CITIZENS: SITTING ON THE DOCKET ALL DAY, WASTING TIME

March 2, 2022

By: Calvin Lee, Volume 106 Staff Member Sovereign Citizens: a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. The once-isolated political sect has ballooned to over 300,000 followers, and the rapid proliferation of their pseudo-legal ideologies is severely compromising court efficiency.[1] Sovereign Citizens’ abject refusal to stipulate to even the most basic tenets of the…

THE FINAL WHISTLE FOR AMATEURISM: NCAA AND ANTITRUST

March 1, 2022

By: Adler Pierce, Volume 106 Staff Member An amateur, as defined by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), “is someone who does not have a written or verbal agreement with an agent, has not profited above his/her actual and necessary expenses or gained a competitive advantage in his/her sport.”[1] The concept of “amateurism” has been…

A HARD PILL TO SWALLOW: PURDUE PHARMA AND THE FUTURE OF THIRD-PARTY RELEASES IN BANKRUPTCY COURT

February 28, 2022

By: Marine Loison, Volume 106 Staff Member I. INTRODUCTION The Sackler name has been synonymous with the opioid crisis in the United States. Now, it has also become a household name in Bankruptcy Court.[1] On December 16th, 2021, Judge McMahon answered the “great unsettled question” of Bankruptcy Court’s statutory authorization by granting non-consensual release of third-party…

EXEMPTING THE FAMILY BIBLE: WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL (VALUES AND RELIGIOUS TEXTS)?

February 23, 2022

By: Kaylyn Stanek, Volume 106 Staff Member A primary justification for the U.S. consumer bankruptcy system is giving debtors a fresh start.[1] Although one might assume an individual must exchange all of their assets in exchange for moving forward, this is not true. The Bankruptcy Code[2] and Minnesota law[3] provide “exemptions” that curb a creditor’s…

A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY SHOULD NOT BE ABUSED: HUISHA-HUISHA v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS SHOWS THE ILLEGALITY OF TITLE 42 POLICY

February 22, 2022

By: Xiaoyuan Zhou, Volume 106 Staff Member On January 19, 2022, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in Nancy Huisha-Huisha v. Alejandro Mayorkas.[1] The case is about whether the public health laws under 42 U.S.C. § 265, often referred to as the “Title 42 Policy,” grant the Center of Disease…