Articles, Essays, & Tributes
Aiming for Answers: Balancing Rights, Safety, and Justice in a Post-Bruen America
By CHAD NOWLAN. Full Text. A foreword to the symposium issue of Minnesota Law Review volume 108.
Firearms Carceralism
By JACOB D. CHARLES. Full Text. Gun violence is a pressing national concern. And it has been for decades. Throughout nearly all that time, the primary tool lawmakers have deployed to stanch the violence has been the machinery of the criminal law. Increased policing, intrusive surveillance, vigorous prosecution, and punitive penalties are showered on gun…
Firearms and the Homeowner: Defending the Castle, the Curtilage, and Beyond
By CYNTHIA LEE. Full Text. In the spring of 2023, a series of back-to-back shootings shook the nation. A Black teenager in Missouri trying to pick up his two younger siblings went to the wrong door and rang the doorbell. The homeowner came to the door with a gun and, without saying a word, fired…
Age Restrictions and the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, 1791–1868
By MEGAN WALSH AND SAUL CORNELL. Full Text. The disproportional misuse of firearms by eighteen-to-twenty-year-olds has long been a problem in America. The concerns are not novel. Nor are legislative responses to this problem a recent development in American law. These limitations are deeply rooted in American legal history. While minimum age gun laws routinely…
Scientific Context, Suicide Prevention, and the Second Amendment After Bruen
By ERIC RUBEN. Full Text. The Supreme Court declared in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen that modern gun laws must be “consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation” to survive Second Amendment challenges. Scholarship has shown how this test of historical analogy presents difficulties because of how technological, legal,…
Trouble’s Bruen: The Lower Courts Respond
By BRANNON P. DENNING AND GLENN H. REYNOLDS. Full Text. New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen revolutionized the understanding of how Second Amendment cases are to be adjudicated. Rejecting the tiered-scrutiny analysis around which the lower courts had coalesced since the 2008 Heller decision, the Court instructed courts to look to history…
The Second Amendment’s Racial Justice Complexities
By DANIEL S. HARAWA. Full Text. The relationship between the Second Amendment and racial justice is complicated. That’s because the relationship between pe- nal administration and racial justice is complicated. The briefing in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen perfectly proves this point. A group of public defenders favored striking down New…
Notes
Answering the Call: How Reconfiguration of the Nation’s Mental Health Crisis Call Line Can Facilitate Reimagination of Community Well-Being and Public Safety
By LUCY CHIN. Full Text. When the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline went live in Summer 2022, communities across the country began to confront the question of how this new, expanded behavioral health resource would integrate into the country’s preexisting, emergency response systems. The program seemed to promise the solution to an increasingly visible problem—as…
The Mississippi River Basin Compact: A New Governance Structure to Save the Mississippi River
By JOHN STACK. Full Text. The Mississippi River is one of the most significant and yet one of the most imperiled water bodies in the United States. It faces a myriad of problems, from rampant pollution, widespread flooding, wildlife habitat loss, and considerable droughts. Indeed, this is a critical time for the Mississippi River. Fall…
States’ Obligation to Provide for Trans Youth: How Medicaid Requires (Most) States to Provide Access to Puberty Blockers
By GRACE WORCESTER. Full Text. Over the last few years, many states have endeavored to strip minor access to gender-affirming healthcare, and these efforts have seen considerable success. By the end of 2023, twenty-two states had enacted legislation that limits youth access to gender- affirming healthcare. In line with these efforts, many states have created…
Headnotes
Defining Common and Individual Issues in Class Actions: What a Reasonable Jury Could Do
Defining Common and Individual Issues in Class Actions: What a Reasonable Jury Could Do By Aaron D. Van Oort and John L. Rockenbach Full essay here. The distinction between common and individual issues is the single most important concept in the modern class action, and…
The Supreme Court’s Opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy Has the Potential To Be Extremely Destructive
The Supreme Court’s Opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy Has the Potential To Be Extremely Destructive By Richard J. Pierce, Jr. Full essay here. In this essay, Professor Pierce describes the legal framework within which the Supreme Court decided whether an agency could adjudicate a class…
Substance over Symbolism: Do We Need Benefit Corporation Laws?
BY CHENG-CHI (KIRIN) CHANG. Full essay here. Benefit corporation laws have gained traction as mechanisms to integrate societal and environmental objectives into business operations, yet they are arguably superfluous within the existing legal framework. The prevailing belief that corporations must prioritize shareholder wealth above all…
A Great American Gun Myth: Race and the Naming of the “Saturday Night Special”
By Jennifer L. Behrens and Joseph Blocher. Full Text. At a time when Second Amendment doctrine has taken a strongly historical turn and gun rights advocates have increasingly argued that gun regulation itself is historically racist, it is especially important that historical claims about race…
Refining the Dangerousness Standard in Felon Disarmament
By Jamie G. McWilliam. Full Text. To some, 18 U.S.C. 922(g) is a necessary safeguard that keeps guns out of the hands of dangerous persons. To others, it strips classes of non-violent people of their natural and constitutional rights. This statute makes it a crime…
“Proven” Safety Regulations: Massachusetts 1805 Proving Law As Historical Analogue for Modern Gun Safety Laws
By Billy Clark. Full Text. Concerned by the public health threats posed by certain firearms, the Massachusetts legislature enacts a law to set safety standards for firearms in the Commonwealth. Firearm dealers across the State, including some of the leading manufacturers of the day, not…
Curbing Gun Violence Under PLCAA and Bruen: State Attorney General–Driven Solutions to the Surging Epidemic
By David Lamb. Full Text. At the same time that the deadly toll of gun violence continues to grow in the U.S., now taking nearly 50,000 lives per year, federal lawmakers and courts have increasingly constrained government authorities’ tools for fighting the epidemic. Pursuant to…
De Novo Blog
GUILTY UNTIL EXPUNGED: HOW MINNESOTA’S PUBLIC RECORDS POLICIES NEEDLESSLY BURDEN RENTERS
By: Ashley Meeder, Vol. 105 Staff Member If you have $285 for a filing fee and 20 minutes to fill out a form in Minnesota, you can ruin someone’s life.[1] Filing an eviction complaint starts a legal battle, but renters are wounded before they even…
THE LAW DOESN’T CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS: BEN SHAPIRO’S UNSUCCESSFUL FIRST AMENDMENT SUIT AGAINST THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AND THE CASE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY-BASED SPEECH RESTRICTIONS
By: Alenah Luthens, Volume 105 Staff Member “Facts don’t care about your feelings” is conservative pundit Ben Shaprio’s trademark phrase.[1] And he’s right. Indeed, the phrase proved particularly true in Young America’s Found. v. Kaler where Shapiro’s free speech lawsuit against the University of Minnesota…
CONTRACTS AND COVID-19: DEFENDING NONPERFORMANCE WITH FRUSTRATED PURPOSE AS A SHIELD
By: Brice Michka, Volume 105 Staff Member As the United States trudged through the most grueling months of the COVID-19 pandemic, countless contracts were affected. Many sporting organizations, including the National Basketball Association, Kentucky Derby, NASCAR, Indianapolis 500, Major League Soccer, National Hockey League, and…
NBA PLAYERS PROTEST: WHY THEIR REFUSAL TO PLAY COULD PROVOKE LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS
By: Jason Leadley, Volume 105 Staff Member On August 23, 2020, police officers shot Jacob Blake, a 29-year-old Black man from Kenosha, Wisconsin, sparking protests.[1] Following the shooting, the Milwaukee Bucks decided not to take the floor in their Game 5 playoff matchup against the…
TAKING CARE: HOW THE LAW CAN INCENTIVIZE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN AN AGE OF PANDEMICS
By: Nathan Webster, Volume 105 Managing Editor As the United States confronts the Coronavirus pandemic, experts are devoting considerable thought to discerning the best method for overcoming the crisis. While most overt discussions center on the ways medical science can help treat the disease,…
PRISONER’S DILEMMA? HOW THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT RESOLVED A JURISDICTIONAL ODDITY ARISING FROM FEDERAL HABEAS MOTIONS
By: Spencer Davis-Vanness, Volume 104 Staff Member In a recent case, Ralph Duke—prosecuted and convicted in Minnesota during the early 1990s as one of the state’s biggest-ever drug dealers—successfully challenged elements of his conviction under a habeas petition in federal district court in Wisconsin, where…
UNITED STATES V. NEWSOM: CALIFORNIA’S FIGHT AGAINST PRIVATIZED IMMIGRATION DETENTION
By: Natalie Feeney, Volume 104 Staff Member Private prisons have become a focal point of American criminal justice reform in recent years, especially in regard to solving the problem of mass incarceration.[1] According to data from 2017, the number of individuals incarcerated in privately-owned prisons…
CLIMATE CHANGE ISN’T MATERIAL?: HOW PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK V. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION HIGHLIGHTS THE NEED FOR MANDATORY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION DISCLOSURES
By: Han Li, Volume 104 Staff Member Over the past three years, major climate disasters have cost the U.S. over $450 billion.[1] The rate of extreme weather events have doubled over the past five years, meaning these costs will only increase.[2] The threat is anything…
TAP A BUTTON, GET DENIED: UBER’S NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE ADA
By: Carmen Carballo, Volume 104 Staff Member I. A CRASH COURSE ON UBER & SERVICE ANIMALS The basic idea behind Uber is simple — “tap a button, get a ride.”[1] With this simple concept, Uber grew from a small app-based company in San Francisco[2] to…
ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT BY ARBITRATION: DOJ’S USE OF ARBITRATION IN UNITED STATES V. NOVELIS PUTS MATTER OF CONSUMER PROTECTION IN QUESTIONABLE HANDS
By: Hugh Fleming, Volume 104 Staff Member The suit filed by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division against Novelis, Inc. began like any other antitrust enforcement action under the Clayton Act,[1] but quickly took an unusual turn: the parties decided to submit…
